This is indeed a
controversial topic ion the modern world as the perceptive from which a company
or recruiters hire employees varies from one domain to the other to a great
extent. Some look out for skills and excellence of a particular candidate in a
particular field whereas some other recruiters focus on the character and the
nature of the employee who is being interviewed. There can’t be a concrete
solution or a verdict on this topic though in this segment we will try to come
up with a more or less formidable standpoint. William Almonte Mahwah had made his statements in this regard, and
they carry weight. Do check out the web to know more.
The importance of skills
It is a colossal
truth that when a candidate appears for an interview, the interviewer initially
checks out the skill level of the candidate. The academic excellence and his or
her past work experience are considered. The technical expertise holds a
critical role when a candidate appears for an interview. The candidate also
prepares himself or herself so that the questions asked on skills can be
countered with ease. Do check out the web, and you will find what the
ever-popular William Almonte had to
say about this concept.
The importance of character
Character and soft
skill is also another segment which is strictly scrutinized nowadays. The
employer monitors the soft skills. This is perhaps done because the company who
is taking the interview considers the fact that only a candidate with a sound
nature and character can give the best for a particular organization. He would
be able to adjust to the ambiance of the workplace which is very much
important. As a matter of fact, sticking to a job is much more important than
cracking a job interview. Some people are amazingly skilled, but as their character
is not up to mark, they don’t stand much of a chance in cracking an important
interview. William Almonte has
emphasized his thoughts on this, and you will find them on the web.
My opinion
If I were the
recruiter for a particular company, I would have preferred to give more stress
on character than skill. This is because a person who is less skilled can be
groomed and with the help of on the job training his submerged experienced
would get brushed up. The reason for which I would prefer giving more stress on
the character is that the soft skills and the nature of the candidate will help
him or her to stick with the company for a long time. If he or she is willing
to work hard and learn new things, the lack of job skills will not make much of
a difference. William Almonte Mahwah has also stated this point of views on the
web, and they hold valid points. This debate will go on forever among
recruiters, as they have different priorities while choosing candidates. Check
them out on the web.